<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tribute on September Eleven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/</link>
	<description>The Unvarnished Truth About Religion, Christianity and Spirituality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:35:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julius</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-33707</link>
		<dc:creator>Julius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/?p=110#comment-33707</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tautriol! I typically only take one RAW image as I don&#8217;t like carrying around a tripod but the multiple RAW do giev the best results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tautriol! I typically only take one RAW image as I don&#8217;t like carrying around a tripod but the multiple RAW do giev the best results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Randall</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-25004</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/?p=110#comment-25004</guid>
		<description>Hi Perry,

I am a former Deacon of a Baptist church in Scotland but have been losing my faith over a number of years for reasons that have to do with my temporal situation, but I feel the need to turn back to God. 

I am really impressed when I read your challenge to the atheists on the information system in DNA and think that this alone, without any other evidence, should cause all atheists to re-think their position if they are truly open to alternative explanations. 

As for me I only have to look out of my window at the wonderful world in all of its magnificence and complexity to understand in the deepest part of my being that God is.

Unfortunately that does not help me, partly because my temporal situation is so stressful and irredeemable, but partly because the proof for God, good and sufficient as it is, does not lead me to a personal God who cares for me. Moreover it does not lead me back to Christ because I cannot see the atonement in the simplistic way that many of my former brethren do, i.e. as some sort of transaction that purchases &quot;salvation&quot; for those who give mental assent to the idea that He cancels their sin by His death and will thereby give them (but only them) eternal life.

What say ye?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Perry,</p>
<p>I am a former Deacon of a Baptist church in Scotland but have been losing my faith over a number of years for reasons that have to do with my temporal situation, but I feel the need to turn back to God. </p>
<p>I am really impressed when I read your challenge to the atheists on the information system in DNA and think that this alone, without any other evidence, should cause all atheists to re-think their position if they are truly open to alternative explanations. </p>
<p>As for me I only have to look out of my window at the wonderful world in all of its magnificence and complexity to understand in the deepest part of my being that God is.</p>
<p>Unfortunately that does not help me, partly because my temporal situation is so stressful and irredeemable, but partly because the proof for God, good and sufficient as it is, does not lead me to a personal God who cares for me. Moreover it does not lead me back to Christ because I cannot see the atonement in the simplistic way that many of my former brethren do, i.e. as some sort of transaction that purchases &#8220;salvation&#8221; for those who give mental assent to the idea that He cancels their sin by His death and will thereby give them (but only them) eternal life.</p>
<p>What say ye?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rodante</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-12383</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rodante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/?p=110#comment-12383</guid>
		<description>Perry,

This is a beautiful letter. From a father&#039;s heart, totally vulnerable, to his son&#039;s ears and soul. What could be more sincere? We all know most of us men don&#039;t &quot;do&quot; sentimental so well. But your uncle, in this writing, poured out all of his deepest feelings straight from the heart. 

I couldn&#039;t help but get choked up while reading, wondering if I would have the strength to press on should the same happen to my son, who is now only 8 years old. I can&#039;t say, at least with a lot of confidence, that I could.

Only in Christ can one have that healing, a healing that can come only from the eternal hope that we, as believers, have in Him, and only in Him. The part where he talked about the day Chris decided to &quot;accept the Lord&quot; as his Saviour, that part brought a sigh of relief to me, and I&#039;m sure to all who read it. That was glorious. 

I&#039;m blessed to &quot;know&quot; you, even though we&#039;ve never met. And I&#039;m proud that a successful entrepreneur can proudly and without shame profess his faith in Jesus in a public forum such as this blog. 

Looking forward to leaning on coffeehousetheology.com a lot more in the coming months.

Sincerely,

Jim in NJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perry,</p>
<p>This is a beautiful letter. From a father&#8217;s heart, totally vulnerable, to his son&#8217;s ears and soul. What could be more sincere? We all know most of us men don&#8217;t &#8220;do&#8221; sentimental so well. But your uncle, in this writing, poured out all of his deepest feelings straight from the heart. </p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t help but get choked up while reading, wondering if I would have the strength to press on should the same happen to my son, who is now only 8 years old. I can&#8217;t say, at least with a lot of confidence, that I could.</p>
<p>Only in Christ can one have that healing, a healing that can come only from the eternal hope that we, as believers, have in Him, and only in Him. The part where he talked about the day Chris decided to &#8220;accept the Lord&#8221; as his Saviour, that part brought a sigh of relief to me, and I&#8217;m sure to all who read it. That was glorious. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m blessed to &#8220;know&#8221; you, even though we&#8217;ve never met. And I&#8217;m proud that a successful entrepreneur can proudly and without shame profess his faith in Jesus in a public forum such as this blog. </p>
<p>Looking forward to leaning on coffeehousetheology.com a lot more in the coming months.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Jim in NJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: June Dewar</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-6001</link>
		<dc:creator>June Dewar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 20:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/?p=110#comment-6001</guid>
		<description>Dear R Drake

Yes God sent his only begotten son.  And the world hated him and Jesus said to his followers John 14:18-20 If the world hates YOU, YOU know that it has hated me before YOU.  If YOU were part of the world the world would be fond of what is its own.  Now that YOU are no part of the world, on that account the world hates YOU.  Bear in mind the word I said to YOU.  A slave is not greater than his master.  If they have persecuted me, they will persecute YOU also; if they have observed my word they will observe YOURS also.  But they will do all these things against YOU on account of my name because they do not know him that sent me.  (words are in capital when spoken to in plural)

Many if not all Christians come to realise that following the example of Christ today incurrs hatred just as it did in the 1st century because the whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one 1st John 5:19.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear R Drake</p>
<p>Yes God sent his only begotten son.  And the world hated him and Jesus said to his followers John 14:18-20 If the world hates YOU, YOU know that it has hated me before YOU.  If YOU were part of the world the world would be fond of what is its own.  Now that YOU are no part of the world, on that account the world hates YOU.  Bear in mind the word I said to YOU.  A slave is not greater than his master.  If they have persecuted me, they will persecute YOU also; if they have observed my word they will observe YOURS also.  But they will do all these things against YOU on account of my name because they do not know him that sent me.  (words are in capital when spoken to in plural)</p>
<p>Many if not all Christians come to realise that following the example of Christ today incurrs hatred just as it did in the 1st century because the whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one 1st John 5:19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: June Dewar</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>June Dewar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 20:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/?p=110#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert

Did the real problem not begin and continue from the very beginning due to the first man and woman turning away from God&#039;s guidance?  Did this not permeate until our day?  Would it be possible for humans to turn from the disobedience inherited and turn to God in obedience to be once again guided? Mankind are heading towards nuclear anihilation and only obedience to God will save us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert</p>
<p>Did the real problem not begin and continue from the very beginning due to the first man and woman turning away from God&#8217;s guidance?  Did this not permeate until our day?  Would it be possible for humans to turn from the disobedience inherited and turn to God in obedience to be once again guided? Mankind are heading towards nuclear anihilation and only obedience to God will save us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-5616</link>
		<dc:creator>robert taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/?p=110#comment-5616</guid>
		<description>History is the signpost to the future.
Lets not make the same mistakes again.
Religeon is the problem, not the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History is the signpost to the future.<br />
Lets not make the same mistakes again.<br />
Religeon is the problem, not the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-5615</link>
		<dc:creator>robert taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/?p=110#comment-5615</guid>
		<description>Atheism does&#039;nt have have to explain everything. It just tries to be rational, I think. Not accepting supernaturalist answers for questions we can&#039;t answer.
Science is not the same thing as atheism. Atheism tries to see beyond the supernatural, the root of which is superstition. Belief in gods.All gods.Even the god of the ancient Isrealites. Just superstition.
Thats just what I think, just my opinion, I don&#039;t speak for atheisism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atheism does&#8217;nt have have to explain everything. It just tries to be rational, I think. Not accepting supernaturalist answers for questions we can&#8217;t answer.<br />
Science is not the same thing as atheism. Atheism tries to see beyond the supernatural, the root of which is superstition. Belief in gods.All gods.Even the god of the ancient Isrealites. Just superstition.<br />
Thats just what I think, just my opinion, I don&#8217;t speak for atheisism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-5613</link>
		<dc:creator>robert taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/?p=110#comment-5613</guid>
		<description>You sound so angry. And so does the God that you believe in.
I do not want to believe in an Angry God.
I do not like angry people, and I do not like Angry Gods.
They are both irrational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sound so angry. And so does the God that you believe in.<br />
I do not want to believe in an Angry God.<br />
I do not like angry people, and I do not like Angry Gods.<br />
They are both irrational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bouneb zine el abidine</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-5096</link>
		<dc:creator>bouneb zine el abidine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/?p=110#comment-5096</guid>
		<description>Dear perry ;

as the quran promised the islam will be the dominated religion

see this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueMwkjvlGL4&amp;feature=related



best regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear perry ;</p>
<p>as the quran promised the islam will be the dominated religion</p>
<p>see this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueMwkjvlGL4&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueMwkjvlGL4&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>best regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biagio</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/tribute-september-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-3369</link>
		<dc:creator>Biagio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeehousetheology.com/?p=110#comment-3369</guid>
		<description>I have read different parts of your site and find it very well done, particularly regarding the intelligent evolution. I have a question for you. While the intelligent evolution is a process guided by an algorithm that led from the first cell to man, as this possibile according with the Bible? Adam lived 6,000 years ago according Scriptures, while the first Homo Sapiens Sapiens developed form evolution is lived 200,000 years ago. The chronological aspect is what I find really difficult, if not impossible to reconcile Bible and Science. It seems to me that even if CLEAR adn SURE man is designed by God, if this drawing was made 200,000 years ago, this destroys HOWEVER the TOTAL validity of the Bible that speak of 6,000 years. Genealogies of chapters 5 and 11 of Genesis, speak clearly of 6 thousand years, maximum 10 th. yrs not of 200 thousand years! I find no convincing explanation of these two chapter as &quot;merely simbolic&quot; of &quot;genealogies with 194,000 years full of holes&quot; :-/ from the old earth creationism, and I also find unconvincing explanations from the young-earth creationism that the earth and universe has only a few thousand years and all the datations of Homo Erectus, Sapiens, Neanderthal are all false :-\ 
This is my problem. Sorry if what I said may be not inherent in this section, feel free to move wherever you want, just tell me where via email: brellotto@yahoo.it and send me the link so I can read your response.
God bless you,
Biagio from Italy
P.S. Sorry for bad english :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read different parts of your site and find it very well done, particularly regarding the intelligent evolution. I have a question for you. While the intelligent evolution is a process guided by an algorithm that led from the first cell to man, as this possibile according with the Bible? Adam lived 6,000 years ago according Scriptures, while the first Homo Sapiens Sapiens developed form evolution is lived 200,000 years ago. The chronological aspect is what I find really difficult, if not impossible to reconcile Bible and Science. It seems to me that even if CLEAR adn SURE man is designed by God, if this drawing was made 200,000 years ago, this destroys HOWEVER the TOTAL validity of the Bible that speak of 6,000 years. Genealogies of chapters 5 and 11 of Genesis, speak clearly of 6 thousand years, maximum 10 th. yrs not of 200 thousand years! I find no convincing explanation of these two chapter as &#8220;merely simbolic&#8221; of &#8220;genealogies with 194,000 years full of holes&#8221; :-/ from the old earth creationism, and I also find unconvincing explanations from the young-earth creationism that the earth and universe has only a few thousand years and all the datations of Homo Erectus, Sapiens, Neanderthal are all false :-\<br />
This is my problem. Sorry if what I said may be not inherent in this section, feel free to move wherever you want, just tell me where via email: <a href="mailto:brellotto@yahoo.it">brellotto@yahoo.it</a> and send me the link so I can read your response.<br />
God bless you,<br />
Biagio from Italy<br />
P.S. Sorry for bad english :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
